Joshua Charlton vs Cade Birrell Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Sep at 04:40 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Charlton vs C. Birrell

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Charlton 1 - 0 Birrell
They have played 2 sets in total, with Joshua Charlton winning 2 and Cade Birrell winning 0. The last match between Joshua Charlton and Cade Birrell was at the M25 Tamworth, 17-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Joshua Charlton getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Charlton | 1 |
Birrell | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Tamworth(09-17-25)
J. Charlton vs C. Birrell H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
55.63% (89-71) | Career Total W/L | 37.91% (58-95) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Charlton vs C. Birrell Match Preview:
- Birrell's second serve performance is slightly stronger, winning 44.08% of points compared to Charlton's 43.87%. Could this minor edge affect the outcome?
- When it comes to handling their opponents' second serves, Birrell shows more efficiency, claiming 46.6% of points, whereas Charlton manages 44.34%.
- Charlton, however, edges out Birrell in first serve return wins, with 26.83% to Birrell's 26.37%.
- Under pressure, Birrell has a slight advantage, saving 57.14% of breakpoints, while Charlton has saved 54.88%.
- In terms of overall recent match performance, Charlton appears stronger, with a win rate of 55.17% over the past year, against Birrell's 32.14%.
- Though both players favor grass, Charlton exhibits a superior win rate on this surface at 63% compared to Birrell's 45%.
- Charlton participates at a similar event level to Birrell, but wins a greater proportion of matches in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at 56.25%, while Birrell clocks in at 30.77%.
- Analyzing opponent quality, Birrell has faced tougher competition with an average rank of 47.18, as opposed to Charlton's opponents, averaging 350.5.
- If the match heads to a deciding set, Charlton appears more reliable with a 63% winning record, contrasted with Birrell's 50%.
- Birrell excels in converting breakpoints, achieving a 56.25% conversion rate, while Charlton manages 28.18%, which could be crucial in tightly contested moments.
Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents an intriguing battle between Birrell and Charlton, each with distinct competitive strengths.
Birrell demonstrates a slight advantage in second serve performance and excels in converting breakpoints. These skills could prove pivotal if the match becomes a tense affair.
Charlton, on the other hand, boasts a higher overall win rate and superior deciding set success. Additionally, Charlton seems more accustomed to emerging victorious in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments.
While Birrell has faced stiffer competition over the past year, Charlton's consistency on grass and stronger match performance cannot be overlooked.
Considering these factors, Charlton seems to have the upper hand and is likely to win this match, leveraging their consistent match-winning record and prowess on their favored surfaces.
Joshua Charlton vs Cade Birrell Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Charlton vs C. Birrell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 5 |
14 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:26:56 | Average Match Time | 1:26:56 |
83% (49/59) | 1st Serve % | 71% (37/52) |
76% (37/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (22/37) |
60% (6/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (7/15) |
50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
44% (23/52) | Return Points Win % | 27% (16/59) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Charlton Recent Matches Played
C. Birrell Recent Matches Played

J. Charlton vs C. Birrell Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
55.63% (89/71) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.91% (58/95) |
54.08% (199/169) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.32% (138/213) |
52.47% (1887/1709) | Games Win/Loss | 46.56% (1644/1887) |
55.47% (71/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 38.53% (42/67) |
58.33% (7/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 27.27% (6/16) |
25.00% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
62.50% (10/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.45% (10/12) |
0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
530 | Aces Total | 168 |
0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
154 | Total Double Faults | 227 |
1:12:56 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
316.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 128.82 |
70% (5128/7310) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1812/3087) |
68% (3468/5128) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1187/1812) |
51% (1103/2182) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (541/1275) |
37% (248/664) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (107/243) |
38% (2796/7441) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1102/2955) |
42.86% (6/8) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
56.85% (83/63) | Futures W/L | 37.75% (57/94) |
55% (87/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (58/153) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
43% (21/49) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 34% (12/35) |
55% (27/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (23/45) |
86% (86/74) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (59/49) |
14% (86/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (59/10) |
20% (74/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (94/9) |